| We appreciate you for choosing to visit the site of the Research Institute for Progression of Knowledge (RIPK) where we aim at rapid publication of high quality research while maintaining rigorous but sympathetic peer review process. We bring the highest quality research to the global academic community by facilitating quick time |
publication and minimizing administrative costs as well as provide authors and minimizing administrative costs as well as provide authors with excellent level of services, including authorization, which allow their research works to be extensively propagated as possible. We provide free access to research information around the globe online without financial, legal or technical barriers.
RIPK adopts the Committee on Publication Ethics, Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors on publication ethics.
RIPK is not ordinarily in a position to investigate unprofessional or unethical allegations themselves, but editors have a responsibility to alert appropriate bodies (for example, employers, funders, regulatory authorities) and urge them to investigate. RIPK encourage authors and readers to inform them if they discover errors in published work
RIPK publishes ‘withdrawals’ if work is proven to be unprofessional or unethical, or ‘expressions of concern’ if editors have logical suspicions of misconduct.
RIPK strongly advice that the following must be confirmed:
Editors:
That information relating manuscripts are kept confidential.
That any observed conflict of interest relating manuscripts must be disclosed.
That all manuscripts are evaluated in fairness based on the intellectual content of the paper regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenry nor political values of authors.
The Editorial Board takes responsibility for making publication decisions for submitted manuscripts based on the reviewer’s evaluation of the manuscript, policies of the journal editorial board and legal restrain acting against plagiarism, libel and copyright infringement
Reviewers:
That any observed conflict of interest during the review process must be communicated to the Editor
That all manuscripts are reviewed in fairness based on the intellectual content of the paper regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, citizenry nor political values of author(s).
That any information that may be the reason for the rejection of publication of a manuscript must be communicated to the Editor.
